The Chiba Medical Society

Links

Chiba Medical J. 101E:33-38, 2025

doi:10.20776/S03035476-101E-2-P33

Chiba Medical Society Young Investigator Award Minireview

Apoptosis-inducing function of p53 and its mutations leading to cancer progression

Abstract

p53 plays an important role as one of the most well-known tumor suppressors. Under various stresses, p53 is stabilized and activated, and exerts functions involved in tumor suppression, including the induction of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence. Among these, the induction of apoptosis is very important for preventing tumorigenesis. Stabilization of p53 is regulated by the ubiquitin ligase MDM2 or other proteins such as pARF14. In various cancer cells, TP53 gene mutations are found, and the loss of tumor-suppressive functions and gain of oncogenic functions in mutant p53 have been reported to lead to genomic instability and cancer progression. Herein, we summarize the mechanisms of apoptosis induction and the roles of p53 in this process, in which p53 has transactivation-dependent or transactivation-independent functions. In addition, we summarize the regulators of p53 and the mechanisms of p53 stabilization and activation, cancer-associated TP53 mutations, and functions of mutant p53. This review contributes to the understanding of the tumor-suppressive function of p53 and the significance of disrupted functions of mutant p53 as a target for therapeutic strategies.

Ⅰ.Introduction

p53, one of the most well-known tumor suppressors, was discovered in 1979, and its functions were clarified between 1989 and 19901,2. Induction of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence is the earliest discovered functions of p53. A wide variety of stress signals, such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, and oncogene activation, can induce p53 to perform these functions. Notably, upon DNA damage, p53 is stabilized and activated to arrest the cell cycle and repair the damaged DNA. If the damage is too severe for repair, apoptosis and senescence are induced by p53 to eliminate impaired cells. The loss of p53 function, including inactivating mutations of p53, leads to a failure to eliminate impaired cells, genomic instability, and cancer development3. Approximately half of human cancers have inactivating mutations in p53, and most of the remaining have wild-type p53 without mutations, but with the function inhibited by increasing its inhibitors, reducing its activators, or inactivating its downstream targets, making p53 a central player in cancer research4.

p53 is an essential tumor suppressor that replies to various stress signals by coordinating cellular responses, including cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis, all of which are involved in tumor suppression. Recent studies have revealed the role of p53 in adjusting other cellular processes that affect tumor suppression, including the regulation of metabolism, autophagy, and the oxidative condition of the cell, along with the suppression of stem cell maintenance, invasion, metastasis, and communication within the tumor microenvironment5,6. Among these, the induction of apoptosis is very important for preventing tumorigenesis. Apoptosis is an important mechanism for maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing the onset of diseases, such as cancer. When the apoptosis induction mechanism is distracted by mutations in p53, the risk of cancer development increases significantly, and the restoration of p53 function has become a target for cancer therapy7-9. This review summarizes the role of p53 in apoptosis, regulation of p53 activity, and carcinogenesis when p53 function is distracted.

Ⅱ.Role of p53 in apoptosis induction

p53 is best described as a transcription factor that binds to specific DNA sequences and transactivates several genes with various functions including apoptosis4. By binding to specific DNA sequences and regulating the transcription of apoptosis-related genes, p53 is involved in both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis-inducing pathways. Although the intrinsic pathway is initiated in response to distinct cellular stressors such as DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress, the extrinsic pathway is triggered by external signals from other cells10.

p53 induces apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway, mostly by direct transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins of the BCL-2 protein family, such as PUMA and NOXA, which is also called the BCL-2-regulated or mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (Fig. 1)11. BH3-only proteins bind to anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins (BCL-2, BCL-XL, MCL-1, BCL-W, and BFL1) and inhibit their activity, leading to the activation of BAX and BAK, other pro-apoptotic proteins in the BCL-2 protein family12. Activation of BAX/BAK increases mitochondrial permeability and causes the release of cytochrome c. Cytochrome c binds to apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 (APAF1) and pro-caspase-9 to form a complex called an apoptosome, followed by the activation of caspase-9 and effector caspases, including caspase-3 and -710. Activated caspase-3 cleaves the inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (ICAD), releasing and activating CAD, and the activated CAD executes DNA fragmentation. At the same time, activated caspase-3 cleaves BCL-2 and BCL-XL, causing them to lose their anti-apoptotic functions13. Caspase-7 also has similar functions in apoptosis, but with some distinctions from those of caspase-314. Apoptotic cells with fragmented DNA are phagocytosed and eliminated by nearby cells. p53 also transactivates the genes involved in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, including BAX and APAF111 (Fig. 1).

p53 also has biological activities in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway that are transcription independent (Fig. 1). In this pathway, p53 translocates to the mitochondria and promotes mitochondrial permeabilization by interacting with the anti- and pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins and mediates the release of cytochrome c. Thus, p53 is involved in the activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, and its function is also an important part of p53-induced apoptosis4,15,16.

p53 is involved not only in the intrinsic pathway but also in the extrinsic pathway, which is also called the death receptor pathway (Fig. 1). In the extrinsic pathway, death receptors, including FAS and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2/DR5)4, are clustered according to their cognate ligands10. FAS and TRAIL-R2 /DR5 are p53 target genes11. The cluster formation of death receptors and ligands leads to the recruitment and stabilization of a conformer of the adapter proteins FAS-associated death domain (FADD) and TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), which recruits and activates caspase-810. Activated caspase-8 promotes apoptosis via two parallel pathways. The first is through the direct cleavage and activation of caspase-3 and caspase-7, and the second is through the cleavage of BID (Fig. 1), an apoptosis-promoting BCL-2 family protein. Cleaved BID translocates to the mitochondria and induces cytochrome c release, which in turn activates caspase-9 and caspase-3. Thus, the exogenous pathway is not completely independent of the endogenous pathway but is interrelated and converges on a common execution phase10.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Overview of p53-related apoptosis. Model depicting intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways regulated by activated p53 Purple arrows indicate transactivation-dependent upregulation by p53, broken purple arrow indicates transactivation-independent activation by p53, and brown arrows indicate activation of target protein.

Ⅲ. Regulators of p53

In unstressed non-transformed cells, p53 protein level is very low and often undetectable because p53 can be targeted by the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 for proteasomal degradation11. In addition, MDM2 can bind to transcriptional activation domain of p53 and inhibit its ability for target gene regulation and antiproliferative effect17. However, in response to various stresses, p53 is released from the negative regulator MDM2, thereby stabilizing and activating p53. For example, when cells are exposed to DNA-damaging stress e.g. DNA double-strand breaks or stalled DNA replication forks, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase or ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) kinase is activated, respectively. Then p53 is phosphorylated at serine15 by the kinases, displaced from MDM2, and stabilized5. Phosphorylation of p53 can occur at several sites and the phosphorylation events are critical for p53 stabilization and activation. Once stabilized, p53 accumulates in the nucleus and is activated as a transcription factor. As a feedback regulator of stress response, p53 induces MDM2 expression4.

MDM2 is regulated by phosphorylation, auto ubiquitination18, or binding to p14ARF, which inhibits MDM2 activity and indirectly hinders p53 degradation 19,20. The p14ARF-MDM2-p53 pathway is disrupted in cancer development. In addition, the MDM2 family member MDMX, also called MDM4, associates with MDM2 via the C-terminal RING finger domain and enhances the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of MDM2, thereby promoting the degradation of p5321. MDMX lacks E3-ligase activity but is still crucial for regulating p53 transcriptional activity, both by binding to and suppressing p53, as well as by regulating MDM26. Herpes virus-associated ubiquitin specific protease (HAUSP) modulates the p53-MDM2 network dynamics in response against DNA damage by de-ubiquitinating both p53 and MDM222. Moreover, there are E3 ubiquitin ligases regulating p53, such as COP1, Pirh2, Arf-Bp1, Topors, CARPs37, and Synoviolin, other than MDM2, though the role of these E3 ligases in regulation of levels of p53 needs further confirmation, e.g. in vivo genetic experiments23. These findings suggest that MDM2-independent pathways are involved in regulating p53 activity.

Ⅳ.p53 abnormalities and cancer

Most mutations in the TP53 gene found in cancer cells are point mutations in the DNA-binding domain (DBD), highlighting the importance of DNA binding for the tumor-suppressive function of p5311. The central core spanning residues 100–300 of p53 contains the DBD (Fig. 2) responsible for the sequence-specific binding of p53 to response elements in DNA (p53 DNA REs)24. Most cancer-associated TP53 mutations are missense mutations within this domain, disrupting DNA binding and impairing the tumor-suppressive function. Although other mutations, such as truncating, inframe, and splice mutations, have also been reported, missense mutations in the DBD account for approximately 80% of all TP53 mutations (Table 1). These missense mutations can be classified into two types: DNA contact mutants, which alter residues crucial for direct contact with p53 DNA REs, and structural mutants, which affect protein folding. The six most common mutation hotspots in cancer are R175, G245, R248, R249, R273, and R282 (Table 1). Furthermore, by forming complexes with wild-type p53, mutant p53 proteins show dominant-negative effects that could play important roles early during transformation even though wild-type TP53 allele is retained in cells5,11,25.

Beyond disrupting DNA binding, some of these mutations confer oncogenic properties to p53, potentially contributing to the promotion of tumor cell invasion, migration, proliferation, and metastasis 6,24,26,27. These findings suggest that mutant p53 may elicit not only loss-of-function on tumor suppression but also gain-of-function on oncogenicity that promote cancer development28. One key aspect of this gain-of-function is that mutant p53 interferes with the intramolecular autoactivation of MDM2 and inhibits its E3 ligase activity of MDM2, resulting in accumulation of mutant p53 and contributing to tumorigenesis29,30. Additionally, mutant p53-expressing mice exhibit tumor metastasis at an increased frequency compared with those without p53, showing further evidence of its gain-of-function role in cancer progression29.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2 p53 protein domain structure.

Table 1 Different mutation types and their effects on tumor development

Table 1

Conclusion

p53 induces apoptosis through both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways and is critical for preventing tumorigenesis. p53 acts in both transcription-independent and -dependent manner. Mutant p53, which leads to loss-of-function, dominant-negative effects, and gain-of-function, is an essential target for cancer therapeutic strategies. Therefore, further studies on mutant p53 are required.

Contributors

M. K. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. K. K. reviewed and edited the manuscript. A. K. conceptualized, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All the authors have read the final version of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

A. K. is a member of the Editorial Board of the Chiba Medical Journal. The authors declare that there are no other conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all laboratory members and collaborators who supported this study.

References

  • 1) Finlay CA, Hinds PW, Levine AJ. (1989) The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation. Cell 57, 1083-93.
  • 2) Baker SJ, Markowitz S, Fearon ER, Willson JK, Vogelstein B. (1990) Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53. Science 249, 912-25.
  • 3) Liu Y, Su Z, Tavana O, Gu W. (2024) Understanding the complexity of p53 in a new era of tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 42, 946-67.
  • 4) Green DR, Kroemer G. (2009) Cytoplasmic functions of the tumour suppressor p53. Nature 458, 1127-30.
  • 5) Bieging, K., Mello, S. & Attardi, L. (2014) Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer 14, 359-70.
  • 6) Brady, C. A. & Attardi, L. D. (2010) p53 at a glance. J Cell Sci 123, 2527-32.
  • 7) Arakawa, H. (2005) p53, apoptosis and axon-guidance molecules. Cell Death Differ 12, 1057-65.
  • 8) Ramos H, Soares MIL, Silva J, Raimundo L, Calheiros J, Gomes C, Reis F, Monteiro FA, Nunes C, Reis S, Bosco B, Piazza S, Domingues L, Chlapek P, Vlcek P, Fabian P, Rajado AT, Carvalho ATP, Veselska R, Inga A, Pinho E Melo TMVD, Saraiva L. (2021) A selective p53 activator and anticancer agent to improve colorectal cancer therapy. Cell Rep 35, 108982.
  • 9) Demir S, Boldrin E, Sun Q, Hampp S, Tausch E, Eckert C, Ebinger M, Handgretinger R, Kronnie GT, Wiesmüller L, Stilgenbauer S, Selivanova G, Debatin KM, Meyer LH. (2020) Therapeutic targeting of mutant p53 in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 105, 170-81.
  • 10) Bratton SB, Salvesen GS. (2010) Regulation of the Apaf-1-caspase-9 apoptosome. J Cell Sci 123, 3209-14.
  • 11) Aubrey BJ, Kelly GL, Janic A, Herold MJ, Strasser A. (2018) How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression? Cell Death Differ 25, 104-13.
  • 12) Qian S, Wei Z, Yang W, Huang J, Yang Y, Wang J. (2022) The role of BCL-2 family proteins in regulating apoptosis and cancer therapy. Front Oncol 12, 985363.
  • 13) Porter AG, Jänicke RU. (1999) Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 6, 99-104.
  • 14) Lakhani SA, Masud A, Kuida K, Porter GA Jr, Booth CJ, Mehal WZ, Inayat I, Flavell RA. (2006) Caspases 3 and 7: key mediators of mitochondrial events of apoptosis. Science 311, 847-51.
  • 15) Vaseva AV, Moll UM. (2009) The mitochondrial p53 pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787, 414-20.
  • 16) Marchenko ND, Zaika A, Moll UM. (2000) Death signalinduced localization of p53 protein to mitochondria. A potential role in apoptotic signaling. J Biol Chem 275, 16202-12.
  • 17) Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, Oren M. (1997) Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387, 296-9.
  • 18) Iwakuma T, Lozano G. (2003) MDM2, an introduction. Mol Cancer Res 1, 993-1000.
  • 19) Levine AJ. (1997) p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88, 323-31.
  • 20) Agrawal A, Yang J, Murphy RF, Agrawal DK. (2006) Regulation of the p14ARF-Mdm2-p53 pathway: an overview in breast cancer. Exp Mol Pathol 81, 115-22.
  • 21) Okamoto K, Taya Y, Nakagama H. (2009) Mdmx enhances p53 ubiquitination by altering the substrate preference of the Mdm2 ubiquitin ligase. FEBS Lett 583, 2710-4.
  • 22) Lim KH, Park JJ, Gu BH, Kim JO, Park SG, Baek KH. (2015) HAUSP-nucleolin interaction is regulated by p53-Mdm2 complex in response to DNA damage response. Sci Rep 5, 12793.
  • 23) Marine JC, Lozano G. (2010) Mdm2-mediated ubiquitylation: p53 and beyond. Cell Death Differ 17, 93-102.
  • 24) Chen X, Zhang T, Su W, Dou Z, Zhao D, Jin X, Lei H, Wang J, Xie X, Cheng B, Li Q, Zhang H, Di C. (2022) Mutant p53 in cancer: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic modulation. Cell Death Dis 13, 974.
  • 25) Lai MY, Chang HC, Li HP, Ku CK, Chen PJ, Sheu JC, Huang GT, Lee PH, Chen DS. (1993) Splicing mutations of the p53 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 53, 1653-6.
  • 26) Muller PA, Caswell PT, Doyle B, Iwanicki MP, Tan EH, Karim S, Lukashchuk N, Gillespie DA, Ludwig RL, Gosselin P, Cromer A, Brugge JS, Sansom OJ, Norman JC, Vousden KH. (2009) Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling. Cell 139, 1327-41.
  • 27) Olive KP, Tuveson DA, Ruhe ZC, Yin B, Willis NA, Bronson RT, Crowley D, Jacks T. (2004) Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cell 119, 847-60.
  • 28) Dittmer D, Pati S, Zambetti G, Chu S, Teresky AK, Moore M, Finlay C, Levine AJ. (1993) Gain of function mutations in p53. Nat Genet 4, 42-6.
  • 29) Y ang L, Song T, Cheng Q, Chen L, Chen J. (2019) Mutant p53 sequestration of the MDM2 acidic domain inhibits E3 ligase activity. Mol Cell Biol 39, e00375-18.
  • 30) Xu Z, Wu W, Yan H, Hu Y, He Q, Luo P. (2021) Regulation of p53 stability as a therapeutic strategy for cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 185, 114407.
  • 31) Quinn EA, Maciaszek JL, Pinto EM, Phillips AH, Berdy D, Khandwala M, Upadhyaya SA, Zambetti GP, Kriwacki RW, Ellison DW, Nichols KE, Kesserwan C. (2019) From uncertainty to pathogenicity: clinical and functional interrogation of a rare TP53 in-frame deletion. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 5, a003921.

Others

Address correspondence to Dr. Atsushi Kaneda.
Department of Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine,
Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Phone/Fax: +81-43-226-2039.
E-mail: kaneda@chiba-u.jp

go to the top